🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.