🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the most recent turn in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”